ies
to Catott to en's! No fisma noicemp of tie on ro 2812
t
sir að Led asd tons!feoz“ tuo
.en daha bnemma yoneffeax? "um" war MoLon
t
abrá Heim anoERUS Morizo 08
4.
In my letter of 20th February, 1908,
292
the
first of the series, I requested that questions relating
to appointments to the Registry should be referred to me
for my opinion and advice. This was met by a point-blank
refusal; and the position taken up by Your Excellency was
that the Registrar was the person to be consulted,
the
Colonial Secretary the person to advise. This position has
been completely abandoned; and had the course which Your
Excellency now adopts in connexion with these appointments
been adopted from the first, the entirely satisfactory
arrangement would have been come to at once, and a very
large part of the correspondence would have been saved. I
Join in the wish expressed by Your Excellency in the last
part of paragraph 4 of the letter under reply that a
similar satisfactory conclusion upon all other questions
could be arrived at; the satisfactory conclusion in this
case is the one I desired from the first. My action in
pressing the matter so strongly on Your Excellency has
therefore been justified.
5.
While I am on this subject I must now
inform Your Excellency of the urgent need there was for
taking this action. The Chief Justice was not consulted
in the past, and Your Excellency's first refusal to accede
ies
to Catott to en's! No fisma noicemp of tie on ro 2812
t
sir að Led asd tons!feoz“ tuo
.en daha bnemma yoneffeax? "um" war MoLon
t
abrá Heim anoERUS Morizo 08
4.
In my letter of 20th. February, 1908,
292
the
first of the series, I requested that questions relating
to appointments to the Pegistry should be referred to re
for my opinion and advice. This was met by a point-blank
noteroch nula Kalu Belesio matalosh
to euro) erot
TO MATEUS? Brit 0.7 on bivore notcamp aİNT ON S RT/B68004
refusal; and the position taken up by Your Excellency was
(r) rie A 23?
that the Rapistrar was the person to be consulted,
the
ni novin
Colonial Secretary the person to advise. This position has
been completely abandoned; and had the course which Your
Excellency now adopts in connexion with these appointments
WAZAWAD Sa haisons *VAN TRIM Xałda T dahiw (auiskrue?
ront ste
Cia sroette đò bes,hoftantia aletar? To
Vanc Isogi “po Hotrów, riežu man· UM13 BR .(8) zetno 100
ed to MA, JAL UT ni averɛ erd I e8 275 l bozroqqua aer
antbeelata bia rassuronert allt go bease tasI VAD?
**ARI DA
marby polcarmotni
borulzaa etsi to ned von Lleox" wo” dołów Polytmoq set »l»
B1 OF 740rosteitsa vientues ea hodituesh orel I fatdw bra
barne tænkt nol zinea sfd most exa??!6
1997 ni #YARAK Stutenedo forega
TO
„oon:Taize ati Tograf on ne dolow acost of BRUGRAM
nobilu yner (nog suð- xd modně moléon to Revo” qa
-İTDARBS erotete * * *I hetohrada U 2005 BRI: vnge[[eoXL
•
le kot qno tienene stort os blvoda anayeq and SHLE Lj
THGKONA WAlt to e7837 to WAYS1089 1.3 satımotni to odaa
.extets 70 92818
been adopted from the first, the entirely satisfactory
arrangement would have been come to at once, and a very
large part of the correspondance would have been saved. I
Join in the wish expressed by Your Excellency in the last
part of paragraph 4 of the letter under reply that a
similar satisfactory conclusion upon all other questions
could be arrived at; the satisfactory conclusion in this
case is the one I desired from the first. My action in
pressing the matter so strongly on Your Excellency has
therefore heen justified.
5.
While I am on this subject I must now
inform Your Excellency of the urgent need there was for
rợ taking this action. The Chief Justice was not consult-
-ed in the past, ad Your Excellency's first refusal to acceda
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.